PYP is a VERB, not a noun.
Probably one of my greatest joys is to help usher in new-to-the-PYP teachers into our IB practices. It’s really thrilling when they get over the barrier of “learning a new language” with our PYP jargon, and the framework really clicks into place for them. There’s this moment when teachers realize that they don’t have to be the ones with all the answers, and embrace the process of inquiry. One of my new PYP teachers calls it “PYP-ing”.
Now I know what you’re thinking. Um, cringe—sounds like peeing. Yeah, but I suggest you get your head out of the toilet and focus on what this educator is trying to articulate. The PYP is not a noun—it’s a verb. It’s a demonstration of reflective practice, where we suit up as breathing embodiments of the IB Mission, showing up each day as an example of the Learner Profile in action and using the Approaches To Learning (AtLs) skills to cultivate the spirit of lifelong learning. In my opinion, this is actually a very insightful way to express what we ask, not only our new-to-PYP teachers to do, but all members of our learning community.

As a PYP Curriculum Coordinator, I have a responsibility to model inquiry-based leadership by actively disrupting traditional patterns that reduce professional learning to mere checklists and compliance. My role demands creating conditions where teachers experience genuine agency in their professional growth, moving from passive receivers of information to active constructors of understanding through collaborative investigation and reflection. This is no easy task! But I believ that by fostering a culture where professional learning mirrors the inquiry-based approaches we expect with students, we can transform our school’s professional development from a series of prescribed tasks into meaningful opportunities for growth where teachers’ questions, interests, and initiatives drive their learning journey. But this doesn’t happen overnight, and it may not happen to all the staff at the same pace.
I’ve been exploring the relationship between pedagogical knowledge depth and teacher agency. It truly fascinates me, particularly how it manifests along a continuum of professional growth. I’ve observed that as teachers internalize PYP practices, making them second nature, they naturally seek opportunities to influence positive change both within and beyond their school community.

It seems to me that as a teacher’s conceptual understanding of the framework increases, their willingness to engage and make sense of the elements supports them from being merely told what to do (follow the unit planner) to feeling more confident in expressing their wonderings and seeking out peers for support. I think of it as the “Grappling stage” and shift into teaming up with other mentors who encourage collaboration. I consider this to be the “Growing stage”, in which one builds confidence and competence while cultivating meaningful connections. They develop a professional voice and identity within their context. While many PYP teachers find their comfort zone here, some advance to what I call the “Guiding stage,” in which they yearn to multiply good practice and typically energize the learning community. They are excited to shape practice beyond classroom walls and enjoy empowering others in their journey. They hone their networking skills, and as practitioners, they feel comfortable with ambiguity and discomfort, regularly stretching beyond comfort zones. They are keen to cross-pollinate ideas and open to breaking new ground.
This progression reflects how deepening pedagogical understanding naturally amplifies teacher agency, creating practitioners who not only master their craft but also inspire and influence others in their professional community. For this reason, I feel that there is a need to create ongoing learning experiences for our educators so that no one becomes a barnacle, calcifying their practices, but renewing their commitment to the IB’s mission and to ensuring that our students are leaders and creators of making a world that works for everyone.
I’m curious where you might put yourself?
I was thinking that, even though I am a pedagogical leader, it’s important to go back to the “Grappling Stage” and engage in a beginner’s mindset. This perfectly illustrates why PYP is indeed a verb, not a noun. The Subject-Guidance Review offers a prime example of this dynamic nature. As I engage with new resource materials, contemplate revised transdisciplinary theme descriptors, and participate in IB Exchange webinars, I’m reminded that PYP isn’t a static program to be mastered once and for all. Rather, it’s an ongoing journey of action, reflection, and growth that demands continuous engagement from all of us, regardless of our experience level. This constant evolution and recursive learning cycle exemplifies the active, living nature of PYP – it’s not just something we have, it’s something we do, question, and reimagine together.
Developing learners as leaders is my joy! I am committed and passionate International Baccaluearate (IB) educator who loves cracking jokes, jumping on trampolines and reading books. When I’m not playing Minecraft with my daughter, I work on empowering others in order to create a future that works for everyone.






Or do you pick up your PYP planner and think about how you might ASSESS the learners to figure out what direction you might need to go to support strong concept development and bringing out the best in the Learner Profile and Atls?